Feb. 25, 2025

Embracing Candor: Transformative Leadership and Honest Conversations with Todd Holzman

What if the secret to impactful leadership and thriving relationships lies in embracing honesty, even when it's uncomfortable? On the Uncommon Leader Podcast, we sit down with Todd Holzman, CEO and founder of Holzman Leadership, who shares a deeply personal story from his childhood that shaped his unwavering commitment to truthfulness—a lesson passed down by his father. As we explore Todd's upcoming book, "The Power of Candor," he provides insightful strategies for navigating the "honesty dilemma," where truthfulness and relationship preservation often collide.

This episode unpacks the real cost of sidestepping honest conversations, both in personal and professional spheres. Drawing from pivotal moments, including a significant leadership lesson from 1998 and a consultancy experience with Red Bull, we underscore the transformative power of candid dialogue. Todd's stories illuminate how confronting the fear of negative outcomes can lead to enhanced performance, conflict resolution, and averting unnecessary chaos in any arena, whether at home or in the workplace.

Diving into the intricacies of communication, we highlight the teachings of social scientist Chris Argyris and dissect the "candor gap" prevalent in healthcare and sales industries. Our conversation touches on emotional intelligence and the SIPA framework for difficult discussions, reinforcing the importance of introspection and self-awareness. Todd also reveals his motivations behind creating an app to democratize high-quality communication training, aiming to equip leaders and individuals with the tools to handle real-world conversations effectively and authentically. Join us as we challenge the norms of communication, advocating for a more honest and meaningful exchange in every interaction.

Thanks for listening in to the Uncommon Leader Podcast. Please take just a minute to share this podcast with that someone you know that you thought of when you heard this episode. One of the most valuable things you can do is to rate the podcast and leave a review. You can do that on Apple podcasts, or rate the podcast on Spotify or any other platform you listen.

Did you know that many of the things that I discuss on the Uncommon Leader Podcast are subjects that I coach other leaders and organizations ? If you would be interested in having me discuss 1:1 or group coaching with you, or know someone who is looking to move from Underperforming to Uncommon in their business or life, I would love to chat with you. Click this link to set up a FREE CALL to discuss how coaching might benefit you and your team)

 

Until next time, Go and Grow Champions!!

Connect with me

Chapters

00:00 - The Honesty Dilemma in Communication

07:00 - The Importance of Honest Conversations

14:38 - Mastering Candor in Communication

24:47 - Candor Framework for Difficult Conversations

34:04 - Navigating Conversational Comfort and Control

42:25 - The Power of Honest Conversations

Transcript

WEBVTT

00:00:00.100 --> 00:00:25.751
I'm trying to encourage people, inspire people to get to Cangar as well and helping them make a choice about whether they want to amplify that in their lives through a rigorous investigation of how they're doing now, what the unintended consequences are of that and the untapped opportunities and what could be possible for them at work and lives for their people, their teams, their families, all of it.

00:00:33.381 --> 00:00:35.067
This is the Uncommon Leader Podcast.

00:00:35.067 --> 00:00:38.831
I'm your host, john Gallagher, and I am excited about our guest today.

00:00:38.831 --> 00:00:49.502
Once we get into this conversation and you leave today, you're going to have many tips that are going to help you communicate better with your team, with your family, with your friends, and make a lot of those things happen.

00:00:49.502 --> 00:00:50.587
So I'm excited about that.

00:00:50.587 --> 00:00:59.313
I have Todd Holtzman with me, who has dedicated his career to helping individuals and organizations improve their communication and relationships.

00:00:59.313 --> 00:01:08.375
He's the CEO and founder of Holtzman Leadership, and his upcoming book, the Power of Candor, is set to revolutionize how we approach difficult conversations.

00:01:08.375 --> 00:01:13.587
So, todd, I hope that was getting you teed up as well as I could and getting our conversation started.

00:01:13.587 --> 00:01:14.269
How are you doing today?

00:01:15.191 --> 00:01:15.691
I am great.

00:01:15.691 --> 00:01:16.412
I'm great, Sean.

00:01:16.412 --> 00:01:17.093
Thanks for having me.

00:01:17.734 --> 00:01:19.825
Absolutely Well, I won't give you any break.

00:01:19.825 --> 00:01:28.085
Getting started, I'll give you the same question I always ask my first-time guests on the Uncommon Leader podcast.

00:01:28.085 --> 00:01:32.334
That's really to ask you to tell me a story from your childhood that still impacts who you are today, as a person or as a leader.

00:01:32.334 --> 00:01:34.888
Now we talked a little bit before the show about our age.

00:01:34.888 --> 00:01:36.346
You've got to go back a little ways here.

00:01:36.346 --> 00:01:40.540
I'm going to test your memory, but we won't reveal that completely what we are.

00:01:40.540 --> 00:01:42.364
Let's just say we're mature.

00:01:42.385 --> 00:01:49.120
Yeah, what we are, but let's just say we're, we're mature, yeah.

00:01:49.120 --> 00:02:22.700
So let's see, it's probably circa 1975, 76, and my dad had brought home sony trinitron color 19 I mean, that was the big time for TVs back then and you know, it was kind of like this prized possession of the family my father was at work and my mom was in the kitchen doing whatever, and I saw this nail file and I looked at the screen and I looked at the nail file.

00:02:23.543 --> 00:02:26.792
For some reason I thought nail file and screen, why not?

00:02:26.792 --> 00:02:28.461
So I scraped it.

00:02:28.461 --> 00:02:36.407
And then I was just curious, you know, and apparently very stupid, and I saw it scraped the screen.

00:02:36.407 --> 00:02:45.432
I was like, oh, I threw the nail file like a smoking gun away, ran to my room and just started playing, know uh, to soothe myself.

00:02:46.114 --> 00:02:57.006
And then, you know, father comes home later, I mean many hours later, and comes to my room and would ask me so you know how's?

00:02:57.006 --> 00:02:57.768
How's your day been?

00:02:57.768 --> 00:03:01.680
Oh, pretty good, uh, anything interesting happen?

00:03:01.680 --> 00:03:04.483
No, not nothing, nothing I could think of.

00:03:04.483 --> 00:03:07.848
He goes, are you sure?

00:03:08.748 --> 00:03:14.395
And I start thinking I do that like something's up, I don't know what it is.

00:03:14.395 --> 00:03:22.622
And then he goes and it's not, it's close to christmas and he says santa doesn't like little boys that lie.

00:03:22.622 --> 00:03:27.068
And then I'm like like I have the flashback.

00:03:27.068 --> 00:03:29.031
Oh, my God, I'm so sorry.

00:03:29.031 --> 00:03:36.189
I saw the nail file, I saw the screen, I hit it, I didn't mean to do it and I'm just crying, crying, crying, crying.

00:03:36.189 --> 00:03:43.330
And you know, and he consoled me and he said it's not what you did.

00:03:43.330 --> 00:03:47.604
And he said it's not what you did.

00:03:47.604 --> 00:03:52.728
It's that the important thing is for you to be honest about what you did.

00:03:52.728 --> 00:04:01.556
And that was kind of a very early childhood memory about the importance of honesty and he really drilled that into me.

00:04:01.556 --> 00:04:05.866
You know, say what you think, stand up for yourself.

00:04:05.866 --> 00:04:07.903
Uh, don't lie, tell the truth.

00:04:08.846 --> 00:04:30.644
The problem is is that it was you know he was fine when I was doing that with other people, but when I was doing it with him, you know we didn't see things the same way, didn't go so well, and my mom would often she was, was more kind of emotionally reactive, would kind of react in a bad way.

00:04:30.644 --> 00:04:40.242
So I often felt, you know, if I wasn't honest I'd feel bad right, because my dad had kind of inculcated this into me.

00:04:40.302 --> 00:04:40.583
But then if?

00:04:40.644 --> 00:04:42.144
I wasn't, things would go badly.

00:04:42.144 --> 00:04:59.994
And I hadn't put like a term to it until probably 20 years later, which I called the honesty dilemma, and that has informed my life and my work ever since, because I think a lot of people feel that way every day.

00:04:59.994 --> 00:05:08.031
We all know, I mean, no parent would ever tell their kid, listen, the way to get ahead is try to like screw up the world and lie as much as you possibly can.

00:05:08.031 --> 00:05:18.802
Most parents, either explicitly or or implicitly, are trying to teach their kids like try to do some good in the world, and and and and and tell the truth.

00:05:19.923 --> 00:05:34.057
Um, but we all feel binds about that leaders, managers, salespeople because if we make the truth the thing that we prioritize, it's going to damage relationships.

00:05:34.057 --> 00:05:44.430
But then if we're too concerned about damaging relationships, then often the truth conversations are where candor goes to die, and so, yeah, that's the early childhood story.

00:05:44.430 --> 00:05:49.843
And so so, yeah, that's the early childhood story.

00:05:49.843 --> 00:05:56.502
And since then, um, since I was, since 1994, I've dedicated my life to helping people uh, solve this dilemma and god, I love the connection, love the connection.

00:05:56.523 --> 00:05:59.771
That story, yeah, I remember again, I told you before we got an episode.

00:05:59.771 --> 00:06:01.663
I got you know like like four listeners total.

00:06:01.663 --> 00:06:05.012
Three of them them are my mother, mother-in-law and wife that listen to the show all the time.

00:06:05.012 --> 00:06:19.307
But I think about that and I listen back or have these videos back as a kid, as I'm growing up as well, and I remember mom just saying you know of all the things, just don't lie to me, tell me the truth and keep it out there.

00:06:19.346 --> 00:06:23.250
So I can understand, but then again you'll probably hear if you have nothing nice to say, don't say it.

00:06:23.269 --> 00:06:26.040
So and you'll probably hear if you have nothing nice to say what Phil completely said Don't say anything and choose to say nothing.

00:06:26.040 --> 00:06:27.024
So notice the next message.

00:06:27.024 --> 00:06:28.283
There's the dilemma.

00:06:28.283 --> 00:06:29.928
Right, that's the dilemma.

00:06:29.928 --> 00:06:35.411
Tell me more about that honesty dilemma, because it is a barrier, right, for us in improved communication.

00:06:35.411 --> 00:06:41.187
The other side is, what I heard as well is that sometimes the truth hurts and maybe there's overlap with those two things.

00:06:41.187 --> 00:06:47.480
But you mentioned the honesty dilemma overlap with those two things.

00:06:47.500 --> 00:06:48.343
But you mentioned the honesty dilemma.

00:06:48.343 --> 00:07:00.632
Yeah, I mean, you know, I was on a it's on a podcast yesterday actually, where someone asked me uh, kind of a similar question, but not not so fine-tuned as that one, and I mean, so I think I explained it.

00:07:00.632 --> 00:07:02.362
It's like if you're not honest, bad things happen.

00:07:02.362 --> 00:07:03.952
If you are honest you're not honest, bad things happen.

00:07:03.952 --> 00:07:06.682
And if you are honest, you're afraid bad things are going to happen, right?

00:07:06.682 --> 00:07:25.826
And the question the guy asked me yesterday was do you think that people avoid having, say, honest conversations because of the risks, right, that they think are embedded in having those conversations and the bad things that could result from them?

00:07:25.826 --> 00:07:29.350
And I said yes in part.

00:07:30.211 --> 00:07:40.747
But what people aren't really aware of of all the bad things that are already happening because they're avoiding the truth of things in these conversations?

00:07:40.747 --> 00:07:55.192
Their relationships are already suboptimized, their results are already suboptimized, they're already holding on to something which is bothering them and so they're feeling frustrated and disappointed and demotivated and all of these kinds of things.

00:07:55.192 --> 00:08:12.271
And that's a big reason why people avoid having honest conversations, because if they were aware of all the problems the avoidance of honesty was creating or that we're creating.

00:08:12.271 --> 00:08:15.221
English is my first language, but sometimes grammar escapes me.

00:08:15.221 --> 00:08:22.314
They would be less likely to, much less likely to avoid them.

00:08:22.314 --> 00:08:27.012
And then of course there's, you know, the competence to ensure those conversations go well.

00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:32.390
We got a mentor that has said this to me before and it's one I've read from.

00:08:32.390 --> 00:08:34.960
I've not met him before in person, but it's from reading his stuff.

00:08:34.960 --> 00:08:44.605
He said the most expensive time is the time between when you know you need to have that conversation and when you actually carry that conversation out in an effective way.

00:08:44.605 --> 00:08:47.691
Conversation and when you actually carry that conversation out in an effective way and then all that time in between.

00:08:47.691 --> 00:08:51.456
There there is such an emotional barrier that exists inside of that.

00:08:51.456 --> 00:08:59.321
But also if it's a piece of feedback that you need somebody to improve and you're just afraid to tell them, you're losing all that productivity, you're losing all that profitability, whatever.

00:08:59.321 --> 00:09:01.349
It is in effectiveness that you're losing as well.

00:09:01.349 --> 00:09:03.919
But that becomes the most expensive time.

00:09:03.919 --> 00:09:07.553
I remember I had one of the most profound-.

00:09:07.594 --> 00:09:08.157
Who said that?

00:09:08.157 --> 00:09:08.980
By the way, that's brilliant.

00:09:09.480 --> 00:09:17.250
Oh, that's a John Maxwell quote that I read inside of his book, and I can't remember which one it was, because, unfortunately, that entire road is out there, but it is.

00:09:17.409 --> 00:09:29.215
I mean, it's so true, right, I had a conversation, and I say this I had an employee when I first got into leadership back in 1998 that I wanted to have a tough conversation with and I just didn't know how to have it.

00:09:29.259 --> 00:09:33.772
I finally learned a framework to have that conversation after going to a week-long leadership event.

00:09:33.772 --> 00:09:36.769
If this is all that I got out of that event, it was powerful.

00:09:36.769 --> 00:09:40.482
I was ready to terminate this individual because he couldn't get along with other people.

00:09:40.482 --> 00:09:42.804
His behaviors were bad and I couldn't figure out a way to tell him.

00:09:42.804 --> 00:09:45.467
I just wanted to be nice because I didn't want the guy to be mad at me.

00:09:45.467 --> 00:09:48.029
He was the same age as me, we came from the same class and all those things.

00:09:48.029 --> 00:09:56.177
But I ended up being able, with a framework, to have that tough conversation with him and he literally said he said that has got to be the best feedback I've ever gotten.

00:09:56.177 --> 00:09:58.581
That's 1998.

00:09:58.581 --> 00:10:05.191
That individual is still with that same company now as an executive director for the organization and I was getting ready to push him out the door.

00:10:06.192 --> 00:10:11.139
So I remember, um, I've got a few things I want to say.

00:10:11.139 --> 00:10:32.918
Sometimes you just got to pick one, john, you know well, I mean good for you, um, you know, allowing the truth to be your ally and having some faith that the best that could possibly happen will be as a result of prioritizing the truth, and good for you for having faith in this person as well, that they could hear it.

00:10:32.918 --> 00:10:40.443
We often give each other way too little credit and we attribute too much weakness to each other than is actually warranted as a general rule.

00:10:40.443 --> 00:10:44.932
But what it reminds me of and when I can mention clients rule.

00:10:44.932 --> 00:10:47.736
But what it reminds me of, and when I can mention clients I can.

00:10:47.736 --> 00:10:48.518
When I can't, I can't.

00:10:48.518 --> 00:10:54.166
We're working at my team and I were working at Red Bull years ago consulting them.

00:10:54.166 --> 00:10:58.903
We're in this beautiful ski lodge in Park City, utah, called Stein Erickson's and we ran these things called bull shops.

00:10:58.903 --> 00:11:03.528
We had to brand it properly for what they were doing, we'd have like three and a half days in the mountains.

00:11:03.969 --> 00:11:08.144
It was ridiculously luxurious and privileged to be able to even do that.

00:11:08.144 --> 00:11:19.187
And we had a bunch of the I guess it was the GMs or something around the table, running different geographies, and one of the GMs is ready, just like you, ready to get rid of this guy, and they're all agreeing with him.

00:11:19.187 --> 00:11:25.585
I was like okay, so, if I understand it, this is what you think his gap is.

00:11:25.585 --> 00:11:26.926
X, is that right?

00:11:26.926 --> 00:11:30.048
Uh-huh, and this is what your data for this is.

00:11:30.048 --> 00:11:30.870
Here's your examples.

00:11:30.870 --> 00:11:36.274
Y, that's right, and this is all the problems that his behavior is creating.

00:11:37.657 --> 00:11:37.677
Z.

00:11:40.448 --> 00:11:42.741
Yes, so have you told him all this?

00:11:42.741 --> 00:11:47.466
No, so you're ready to fire a guy?

00:11:49.609 --> 00:11:50.990
because he's not behaving these ways.

00:11:51.491 --> 00:12:11.648
He's behaving in this way, which I can understand right, because it is creating problems for sure, but you never actually told him the truth about these things and you're blaming him for being unchangeable and resistant to change.

00:12:11.648 --> 00:12:16.009
I mean, you actually can't make that claim unless you've actually given him the feedback.

00:12:16.009 --> 00:12:18.331
So what you're doing is listen.

00:12:18.331 --> 00:12:28.758
It may be the case that the horse has already left the barn and it's too late to recover the situation, but I think you do have to question the morality of your decision in light of this.

00:12:28.758 --> 00:12:32.422
And it's interesting, it's funny.

00:12:32.442 --> 00:12:33.302
I was angry about it.

00:12:33.302 --> 00:12:34.104
I remember it.

00:12:34.104 --> 00:12:37.528
I was a good bit younger then and this is like 15 years ago so.

00:12:37.528 --> 00:12:53.586
But they agreed and he had the conversation and the person was open to it and he turned his.

00:12:53.586 --> 00:12:54.831
He turned his behavior around, his performance improved.

00:12:54.831 --> 00:13:04.429
They didn't fire him and it's like, yeah, uh, look at how much chaos could have been avoided had they had the conversation earlier.

00:13:04.429 --> 00:13:10.461
And had they not look how coincidental at all.

00:13:10.461 --> 00:13:15.188
This guy's whole life was in the balance.

00:13:15.188 --> 00:13:27.128
And had these guys not come to utah and had that conversation not occurred, all these bad things would have happened and, of course, these guys would never have learned anything either?

00:13:27.128 --> 00:13:37.591
The leaders themselves, and this is why will I screw up your next question or can I just say a little more about this candor thing?

00:13:37.650 --> 00:13:38.552
Todd, go ahead, come on.

00:13:38.552 --> 00:13:47.447
So, okay, because I know we talked a little bit before and you spent a lot of time in healthcare and consulting to kind of healthcare entities, and we have too.

00:13:47.447 --> 00:14:29.836
We spend a lot of time with several global faculty 13 people, more than half of whom are overseas and the rest are here stateside, lucky enough to not only train leaders at very high levels, like senior levels, like CEOs of pharmas and things like this, but also customer-facing teams, salespeople, msls, patient access people all the like, and we have had a kind of privileged access to the way they actually conduct these conversations with customers.

00:14:29.836 --> 00:14:37.610
And when we develop people, we ask them bring to us a customer conversation.

00:14:37.610 --> 00:14:49.613
That didn't produce the result that you wanted and based upon the work of one of my, my idols, uh, chris argers from harvard.

00:14:49.613 --> 00:14:56.841
So chris taught at the business school, the law school, the graduate school of education, where I studied, the kennedy school of government, where I taught.

00:14:56.841 --> 00:15:09.332
For those of you who are interested in him, imagine, uh, imagine, I was going to say the Einstein of the social sciences, a-r-g-y-r-i-s.

00:15:09.332 --> 00:15:12.456
Chris wrote a bunch of stuff in the Harvard Business Review.

00:15:12.456 --> 00:15:13.216
I don't know.

00:15:13.216 --> 00:15:28.823
He wrote I don't know a few hundred articles, 30 books, received 14 honorary doctorates for his massive contributions to management, leadership, organizational behavior, research, education, anthropology.

00:15:28.823 --> 00:15:39.746
I mean amazing human being and he developed a foolproof tool that we use that helps you.

00:15:39.746 --> 00:15:40.368
It's the best.

00:15:40.368 --> 00:15:44.284
Next thing to like micing people up or filming them when they're actually having real conversation.

00:15:44.284 --> 00:15:51.568
So the point of me telling you this is we get very accurate data on how they're really behaving during these critical conversations with customers.

00:15:51.649 --> 00:16:21.293
Fine, the reason I'm explaining all this is that in every single instance the culprit was a candor gap that they were either not expressing important things they were thinking and feeling to the customer and or asking the kind of questions that were necessary so that the customer would open up and share the truth of what they were thinking with them.

00:16:21.293 --> 00:16:32.241
That's number one, and number two, by the way, largely unaware that that was the reason why the conversations weren't having the impact that they wanted.

00:16:32.241 --> 00:16:36.755
I'm not saying completely unaware, just for the most part unaware.

00:16:36.755 --> 00:16:45.197
They would mostly say the explanation was largely external they're not giving me the time I need, they're very busy.

00:16:45.197 --> 00:16:48.783
They prefer the other therapy, insert explanation.

00:16:48.783 --> 00:16:51.129
I wouldn't call them excuses.

00:16:51.129 --> 00:16:53.474
I think those things are also true.

00:16:54.519 --> 00:17:20.432
But here's what the consequences are, and this is why I have I was just writing a post on this today have made Canada the cause of my life is because the human toll is huge and the level of human suffering is incredibly underappreciated.

00:17:20.432 --> 00:17:27.568
So we'll talk about three levels of suffering For the customer, for the salespeople, in this case, themselves, and for the patient.

00:17:27.568 --> 00:17:38.772
So the customer maybe this is a healthcare, you know, hcp or somebody like this feels like the conversation has been a waste of their time and they're not getting any value out of it.

00:17:38.772 --> 00:17:40.700
Because if you're not saying anything valuable, you know.

00:17:40.700 --> 00:17:44.609
If it's provocative, why would it be interesting and useful to them?

00:17:44.609 --> 00:17:54.211
Fine, and so, of course, then if you're a sales rep, your access to them goes down, because they don't spend time on things they don't consider valuable.

00:17:55.681 --> 00:17:59.971
As a sales rep, you're miserable, right, at least with some set of customers.

00:17:59.971 --> 00:18:04.570
You're feeling very frustrated, you're disappointed, you're demotivated, you're deflated, all of it.

00:18:04.570 --> 00:18:13.213
And getting up out of bed day in, day out, man, talking to these customers when they want to give you a few minutes, I mean I couldn't do it.

00:18:13.213 --> 00:18:15.926
But then you start to think about the patients.

00:18:15.926 --> 00:18:25.073
Well, the consequences of this is that in these instances, the patient ain't getting the medicine they need.

00:18:25.073 --> 00:18:30.188
Oh, that's right, all right, and some of these patients you know.

00:18:30.188 --> 00:18:40.115
The best case scenario is there's an opportunity to improve a patient's life, a life and it's being squandered or delayed.

00:18:40.115 --> 00:18:47.334
The middle case is they're suffering from some horrible disease.

00:18:47.334 --> 00:18:50.066
They eventually get the medicine, but they suffer longer than necessary.

00:18:51.079 --> 00:19:04.715
The worst case scenario is they actually die and when we've had back to that time gap, by the way, too back to that time, how long it takes to get the information they need yep it's you're saying that partially triggered for me to say this.

00:19:05.016 --> 00:19:15.662
And so and by the way, this is not my analysis, it is our analysis, but it's their analysis so we take them through a process of taking a hard look at their case studies.

00:19:15.662 --> 00:19:19.286
We ask them so what is it that you did or didn't do that's preventing you from making progress?

00:19:19.286 --> 00:19:30.006
After we help them understand what good looks like so they could better analyze themselves, and they end up being pretty insightful and they say what are the unintended negative consequences on customers, you and patients?

00:19:30.335 --> 00:19:55.538
What I'm telling you is what they said, and so you know how this work can be, john is, you have a sense of mission about it, but you keep getting re-enrolled in it, because your clients teach you things that make the difficult work of helping people get better at this worthwhile.

00:19:55.558 --> 00:20:03.987
Well, Todd, look, I mean, I love the passion that you have for making that happen In the world of healthcare it exists Again in that consulting space that I've been in as well.

00:20:03.987 --> 00:20:09.991
How many times, frankly, a physician and I'm not taking shots of physicians they got a tough job.

00:20:09.991 --> 00:20:21.999
But in a three-minute conversation they have with a patient, how much time do they have to use candor with a patient that say, if you don't change your behavior, you are going to die at some point in time, because we're all going to die?

00:20:21.999 --> 00:20:40.405
But they don't want to have those conversations, they don't want the patient to be upset with them, and I make up that that's one of the biggest barriers to candor is the desire, whether it's a leader, as a family member, as a physician, whatever that is to be liked, and we don't want someone to be upset with us.

00:20:40.405 --> 00:20:42.561
And so I have two questions.

00:20:43.135 --> 00:20:44.619
The candor piece of it.

00:20:44.619 --> 00:20:47.887
Let's even go down to the basics of that.

00:20:47.887 --> 00:20:51.346
How do you define candor in communication?

00:20:51.346 --> 00:20:57.395
And then the second piece of that is what attributes are needed to be effective in that delivery, Because I make up.

00:20:57.395 --> 00:21:02.307
I could also communicate with candor, but do it by yelling at someone or whatever that is.

00:21:02.307 --> 00:21:04.844
So how do you define it?

00:21:04.844 --> 00:21:07.063
And then, what are the attributes needed to be effective at it?

00:21:07.674 --> 00:21:09.182
Okay, let me address the first question.

00:21:09.182 --> 00:21:18.945
If I lose the thread in the second question, just please bring it back so maybe I could say what it isn't first.

00:21:18.945 --> 00:21:25.925
So it isn't about saying everything you think and feel.

00:21:25.925 --> 00:21:42.644
My partner, olga, who has a reality show sitcom that's on now on Apple TV Okay, shameless plug called Olga Knows Best and unfortunately I'm in it because it's about her life, so I have no choice.

00:21:42.644 --> 00:21:45.579
She would love that.

00:21:45.579 --> 00:21:46.256
Right.

00:21:46.256 --> 00:21:52.640
Let me teach all of our clients to just be fully self-expressed, say whatever you think and feel.

00:21:52.640 --> 00:21:55.996
Great for a reality show man, but not great for real life.

00:21:56.377 --> 00:22:03.471
And actually a managing director of talent at one of our FTSE 100 banking clients told us that we tried something like that.

00:22:03.471 --> 00:22:17.765
We instituted a value years ago, before we ever came along, called something like straight talk or whatever it was, or direct conversations, and she said it gave license to every sociopath to say what they thought and felt, regardless of how unkind it was.

00:22:17.765 --> 00:22:20.272
So what we like to say and I like to say what they thought and felt, regardless of how unkind it was.

00:22:20.272 --> 00:22:29.529
So what we like to say and I like to say, like candor without compassion can be cruel, it's equally okay.

00:22:29.529 --> 00:22:47.184
It's equally not about only you saying what you think and feel, because none of us as individuals are omniscient, and so a piece of truth, hopefully, or some aspect of reality exists in my head.

00:22:47.184 --> 00:22:55.422
But we've all got pieces of the puzzle and we have to combine these puzzle pieces to form a more complete picture of what's actually true.

00:22:55.422 --> 00:23:01.191
And I was talking to the definition I'm going to give you.

00:23:01.191 --> 00:23:07.003
I have shamelessly stolen it, but it came from one of our clients.

00:23:07.786 --> 00:23:12.885
So Ed Jenkins I Ed British guy.

00:23:12.885 --> 00:23:13.869
I think he still lives in the UK.

00:23:13.869 --> 00:23:18.297
I think he might be working for AstraZeneca now, I'm not sure, but he was working for a different farmer when we worked together.

00:23:18.297 --> 00:23:23.181
I think he might be working for AstraZeneca now, I'm not sure, but he was working for a different farmer when we worked together and we had gone through this.

00:23:23.181 --> 00:23:24.221
He had gone through this program.

00:23:24.221 --> 00:23:28.545
He was the franchise head for important therapy for the United Kingdom and I think up reporting into him.

00:23:28.545 --> 00:23:33.429
He had kind of commercial leaders and salespeople and he had medical leaders and salespeople.

00:23:33.949 --> 00:23:40.635
So he and all these different levels went through our kind of candor program and it delivered a great result.

00:23:40.635 --> 00:23:52.587
You know, despite the company going through a big reorg, despite them losing their with the FDA.

00:23:52.587 --> 00:23:55.971
They didn't get the approval for the earlier line of therapy.

00:23:55.971 --> 00:24:12.902
People kept using what they learned and they grew orders which was amazing and I didn't think would happen because you're in the middle of reorg and then you don't get approved for earlier therapy and then your competitor does, and all the HTPs are looking at the competitor's drug and say why are you going to buy anything from you, okay?

00:24:12.902 --> 00:24:19.335
So I asked Ed amongst others can you help me understand why the program delivered?

00:24:19.335 --> 00:24:20.781
And it seemed like it delivered a result.

00:24:20.781 --> 00:24:22.362
Well, first of all, do you think it did, Okay?

00:24:22.362 --> 00:24:24.242
And if so, what actually happened?

00:24:24.242 --> 00:24:29.587
I mean, I have some sense of why it happens, but we're not there watching people what they're doing with it.

00:24:29.587 --> 00:24:34.200
They're not inside of people's heads, so I don't know 100% what they're actually doing.

00:24:34.701 --> 00:24:37.164
And this is the definition of candor.

00:24:37.164 --> 00:24:39.909
That now is kind of our North star as a firm.

00:24:39.909 --> 00:24:47.021
And he said I always thought of these conversations that either something to win or to avoid.

00:24:47.021 --> 00:24:59.269
Because now I understand that candor is treating every conversation as a collaborative search for the truth in order to make things better.

00:24:59.269 --> 00:25:14.679
And I have to say, john, that really hit me two years ago, I guess maybe two and a half and it's like wow, somebody finally explained to me what the heck I've been doing and I was very grateful for it.

00:25:14.679 --> 00:25:22.556
And so that's how we think of it, and I think this is why this is a mind shift for people.

00:25:24.621 --> 00:25:35.269
Um, because in some ways the conversations seem tougher for people because of how they're thinking about the conversation, like, oh, I've got to convince them they're wrong and I'm right.

00:25:35.269 --> 00:25:48.906
But if you think a bit, as this conversation is meant to do some good in the world, maybe it's also a way I'm trying to serve this person as well.

00:25:48.906 --> 00:26:03.003
So you're trying to serve something outside of yourself this person, the team, the impact this team has on important things and people then it kind of shifts your orientation.

00:26:03.003 --> 00:26:06.343
So then, and then if you start to think of.

00:26:06.343 --> 00:26:15.625
Okay, I'm trying to do some good through the conversation, but I have to treat it as a collaborative search for the truth and I have to have kind of courageous humility.

00:26:15.625 --> 00:26:22.060
This is maybe this is a variable, one of the variables you were talking about or aspects of it.

00:26:22.541 --> 00:26:35.539
It's like, okay, I have the courage to express the truth of what I think, but I have to have the humility to be open to and to even invite people to tell me where I'm wrong, because what I care about is not being right.

00:26:35.539 --> 00:26:36.842
I care care about what's true.

00:26:36.842 --> 00:26:45.723
So then a lot of you who are listening and thinking about having tough conversations it doesn't mean it makes the conversation easy, by no means.

00:26:45.723 --> 00:26:48.541
You are right to be worried about these things.

00:26:48.541 --> 00:26:49.464
It's not in your head.

00:26:49.464 --> 00:26:52.285
You don't need some psychotropics to help you deal with your anxiety.

00:26:54.616 --> 00:27:02.450
Most of the time your limbic system is telling you something, probably for most often for some good reasons.

00:27:02.450 --> 00:27:13.527
But if you think of it, if you kind of orient yourself that way the truth on behalf of service then I think it totally affects the way you approach it.

00:27:13.527 --> 00:27:29.643
Then you can say to somebody listen, I'm worried, some of the things that you're doing are kind of damaging your credibility with the team, which I know is important to you and may impact your ability to kind of, you know, get the kind of bonus.

00:27:29.643 --> 00:27:34.765
You're looking at the end of the year and I've been thinking about that and I got some things to share with you.

00:27:34.765 --> 00:27:35.816
That, I think, could be helpful.

00:27:35.816 --> 00:27:38.885
You interested in talking about it?

00:27:38.885 --> 00:27:41.357
I don't see why that.

00:27:41.357 --> 00:27:48.365
It's not that that conversation won't be upsetting, but it doesn't mean the person will be upset with you.

00:27:48.365 --> 00:27:52.984
They'll be upset with the reality of the situation.

00:27:54.915 --> 00:27:58.066
Hey listeners, I want to take a quick moment to share something special with you.

00:27:58.066 --> 00:28:06.066
Many of the topics and discussions we have on this podcast are areas where I provide coaching and consulting services for individuals and organizations.

00:28:06.066 --> 00:28:19.424
If you've been inspired by our conversation and are seeking a catalyst for change in your own life or within your team, I invite you to visit coachjohngallaghercom forward slash free call to sign up for a free coaching call with me.

00:28:19.424 --> 00:28:27.465
It's an opportunity for us to connect, discuss your unique challenges and explore how coaching or consulting can benefit you and your team.

00:28:27.465 --> 00:28:30.239
Okay, let's get back to the show.

00:28:30.239 --> 00:28:33.886
That's awesome.

00:28:33.886 --> 00:28:34.448
So I love that.

00:28:34.448 --> 00:28:36.061
I mean what I'm hearing you saying.

00:28:36.082 --> 00:28:43.219
The attributes that need to be there courage and humility are the kind of entry If you get into the conversation.

00:28:43.219 --> 00:28:46.007
You've got to have both those things ultimately overcoming.

00:28:46.007 --> 00:29:05.526
What Mark Twain would say is that we can make up a lot of bad things that are about to happen 90% of them which will never occur in terms of the quote that he has, but there still may be a bad response to it, but the piece that comes after that is even that specific behavioral observation that goes along with it.

00:29:05.526 --> 00:29:08.237
So I have courage, I have humility, but I better have specifics to be able to communicate with the individual.

00:29:08.237 --> 00:29:16.026
Back to your point not to be right, not to be right necessarily, but so that they can take an action from it and do something different.

00:29:16.515 --> 00:29:18.140
Well, let's use your framework, right?

00:29:18.140 --> 00:29:19.564
You were telling me a little bit about this before.

00:29:19.564 --> 00:29:20.425
What was the framework?

00:29:20.425 --> 00:29:20.955
You?

00:29:20.976 --> 00:29:23.965
had situation, behavior, impact and action.

00:29:23.965 --> 00:29:25.378
What do I need you to do?

00:29:25.378 --> 00:29:26.182
Going forward Yep.

00:29:26.303 --> 00:29:26.663
All right.

00:29:26.663 --> 00:29:37.161
So let's take the first three, because if you dump the, the A is certainly important in that framework If you introduce the A too soon, then what happens to the leaders?

00:29:37.161 --> 00:29:45.364
This is one of the big traps that we see in the data set of like 50,000 conversations that we've studied People jump to action too quickly before they have agreement on the problem.

00:29:45.364 --> 00:29:51.785
So you're trying to get agreement on the SIP right for situation, impact and behavioral examples.

00:29:51.785 --> 00:29:52.226
Is that right?

00:29:52.226 --> 00:29:53.327
Did I get that right?

00:29:53.327 --> 00:29:57.798
Okay, fine, so I think that's a wonderful framework.

00:29:58.780 --> 00:30:01.865
You can see in that example that I was giving, all I did was put a frame around it.

00:30:01.865 --> 00:30:02.887
That's right.

00:30:02.887 --> 00:30:14.284
Right, it's like I'm expressing my intent of sharing all this stuff with you, and this is sometimes when converse without the frame, if you throw it.

00:30:14.284 --> 00:30:18.316
I'm not saying this is always true, but sometimes it'll be true If you go.

00:30:18.316 --> 00:30:19.378
I got some feedback for you.

00:30:19.378 --> 00:30:22.666
Here's the situation, you know, here's the impact, here's the behavioral examples.

00:30:22.666 --> 00:30:26.099
Great, if you don't put the frame around it.

00:30:26.099 --> 00:30:28.786
I want to talk to you about something.

00:30:28.786 --> 00:30:29.807
Yes, right.

00:30:29.815 --> 00:30:45.787
You know that I think is, and sometimes you can name the impact that is having potentially this impact on you and things that you and we care about, then they could easily attribute to you're just trying to give them a hard time, right, you know?

00:30:45.787 --> 00:31:10.435
And when you're receiving and oftentimes when we're talking to each other no-transcript emotional to some degree, they're going to be provocative, they might be upsetting, because if we're talking, if we disagree with each other, well, that's what we can do over a beer, right.

00:31:10.435 --> 00:31:15.961
But if I'm talking about something important, that probably I'm not sure if this is right, but let me say it out loud and see what you think.

00:31:15.961 --> 00:31:25.848
I'm probably talking to you because I don't think you're either taking action on something properly or I don't think you're aware of something that you need to be aware of.

00:31:26.375 --> 00:31:27.117
Or I don't think.

00:31:27.117 --> 00:31:29.846
Maybe you are aware of it, but you aren't taking it seriously enough.

00:31:31.276 --> 00:31:31.858
I think you're spot on.

00:31:31.858 --> 00:31:34.041
I often refer to some of those conversations.

00:31:34.041 --> 00:31:38.994
If you're not getting a little blood on the carpet, it's probably not really worth the conversation.

00:31:38.994 --> 00:31:43.199
And to your point that happens I mean fights happen at your point Drinking it.

00:31:43.199 --> 00:31:47.587
Right, you throw a beer mug at the other person, kind of thing that's proverbial.

00:31:51.615 --> 00:31:58.227
So I'm fine for conversations where we're shooting the shit, that's fun, right, or we're in the UK, just recreational.

00:31:58.227 --> 00:32:06.394
But if I'm talking to you about something that matters to me, it means, by definition, I don't think it's mattering enough to you.

00:32:06.394 --> 00:32:13.462
I don't think it's mattering enough to you, I don't think you're dealing with it properly or even think you're seeing it.

00:32:13.462 --> 00:32:16.930
So embedded in these important conversations is going to be conflict, you know, by definition.

00:32:16.930 --> 00:32:24.868
Now, because of that, because the conversation will almost always generate some discomfort for people.

00:32:25.954 --> 00:32:35.950
When people feel uncomfortable, they're more likely to make negative attributions about your motives and about what your intent of having the conversation is.

00:32:35.950 --> 00:32:41.126
So if you do some good framing, it kind of cleans that up, provided they believe you.

00:32:41.126 --> 00:32:55.019
But also this is what Chris Voss talks about from the Black Swan Group it gives people a moment to kind of brace themselves and get ready for it so they don't get hijacked by their limbic systems.

00:32:55.019 --> 00:33:17.652
So this is why I make it and it's not the only thing we talk about, certainly not but why I make a big point around framing before you dive into the kind of sedo model, you know it's so funny it was excellent, by the way, you and I and I love the, the context you've shared in terms of the action coming in too early.

00:33:17.672 --> 00:33:23.153
So I had a conversation just a couple days ago with a coaching client uh, who's gonna have a tough conversation.

00:33:23.153 --> 00:33:24.726
I said how you gonna start this conversation.

00:33:24.726 --> 00:33:25.775
Take me through how you're going to start it.

00:33:25.775 --> 00:33:28.804
So I'm going to ask as soon as I walk in, I'm going to ask him are they in or not?

00:33:28.804 --> 00:33:33.439
I'm like stop, that's the action portion of this.

00:33:33.439 --> 00:33:35.181
Let's get to this to your point.

00:33:35.181 --> 00:33:41.907
Let's put a frame around this conversation before you bring them to are you in or not, kind of thing, because that's the action you want.

00:33:41.907 --> 00:33:43.209
You want some different behavior.

00:33:43.209 --> 00:33:50.644
You go in that aggressive and you are going to have a fight on your hands because they're going to go, you know, into defense mode.

00:33:50.644 --> 00:33:52.570
Uh, all all these things are going to happen.

00:33:52.570 --> 00:33:56.161
Whatever's coming out is an attack on me that's right in my wording.

00:33:56.181 --> 00:33:57.103
Yeah, that's right.

00:33:57.103 --> 00:34:04.900
I mean, you know, uh, you know, you gotta, you gotta earn the right to say that, yes, exactly right.

00:34:04.900 --> 00:34:05.921
These conversations.

00:34:05.921 --> 00:34:17.572
There is a temperature at which the ingredients need to be baked before they cohere, and we were talking a little bit before, and if you don't want to talk about this, fine.

00:34:17.572 --> 00:34:21.063
Is this the example where this?

00:34:21.083 --> 00:34:21.855
person's worried about them blowing up.

00:34:25.282 --> 00:34:26.764
Yeah, absolutely so let's look at that.

00:34:26.764 --> 00:34:32.865
For a second right, the person's concerned that the person they're going to get this feedback to is going to blow up.

00:34:32.865 --> 00:34:37.523
So then they do something which ensures they will blow up.

00:34:37.523 --> 00:34:44.927
Yep, so what's really interesting is, you know why is that?

00:34:44.927 --> 00:34:54.489
Because I would bet that at some level, he knows better.

00:34:54.489 --> 00:35:03.257
The reason I say that is I'll make two bets with you, one which we will not be able to validate, one.

00:35:03.257 --> 00:35:09.692
If somebody else were going to do the same thing and came to him for coaching or her, he'd probably say don't do that.

00:35:09.974 --> 00:35:22.206
so it means he has a rules in his head that says doing that is a violation of some rule, right, like, don't jump to action before we actually discuss the problem rule, and most people have that in their head.

00:35:22.206 --> 00:35:30.505
But I also my other bet which we could validate is I bet you would have told him that he probably got it pretty quickly is that true?

00:35:31.146 --> 00:35:32.396
oh, I think so absolutely.

00:35:32.396 --> 00:35:37.539
I mean again, if we go back through that conversation, he's gonna say that makes sense, right, I shouldn't do it so?

00:35:38.521 --> 00:35:39.224
so what?

00:35:39.224 --> 00:35:40.447
What is that quick?

00:35:40.447 --> 00:35:41.750
It means he a priority.

00:35:41.750 --> 00:35:45.664
Before he ever heard from you, had a rule in his head that said not to do something like that.

00:35:45.664 --> 00:35:51.648
So then the question becomes so if all that's true, then why does he violate his own rule?

00:35:53.094 --> 00:36:07.471
And because the reason I'm bringing this up is because what we have found, so this guy, chris Argyris, upon whose extraordinary research not everything, but much of what we do is based.

00:36:07.471 --> 00:36:24.217
So what Chris I'll give a very layman's explanation of it discovered is that we've got our principles and we've got our programming, and the two are often in contradiction to each other, contradiction to each other.

00:36:24.217 --> 00:36:29.485
So people believe in I should have the courage to express what I say, what I think.

00:36:29.485 --> 00:36:33.110
I should be deeply curious about what other people think.

00:36:33.110 --> 00:36:44.045
I should also see these conversations as collaborations, where we're trying to make sense out of reality together and, on that basis, trying to figure out what to do about it Right.

00:36:44.045 --> 00:36:46.898
So we see, believe these things.

00:36:47.780 --> 00:37:30.588
What chris discovered when he first did this research in the 70s with 15, 15 000 people we've now, we've now since worked with all 50 000 um is that when people have any kind of concern about that, there's going to be a conflict, that the conversation might be upsetting, that it might be threatening and or embarrassing anything like this, that these principles get short-circuited and get replaced with programming that drives people to keep things too comfortable, that makes them want to win and not make things too competitive, win and not lose the conversation and be super controlling in the conversation.

00:37:30.588 --> 00:37:45.668
And a clinical psychologist I'm fond of, a guy named Jordan Peterson, which I'm sure a lot of listeners have heard of says that our principles are stored in a different part of our brain than is our programming.

00:37:46.090 --> 00:38:00.528
Oh, wow, okay, so we can read these great books, watch YouTube videos, even listen to us talk, and that will hopefully improve the warehouse of information in our brains that stores our principles.

00:38:00.528 --> 00:38:11.268
But the programming, when we feel that the conversation may be threatening and or embarrassing for myself and or other people, gets activated and blocks it.

00:38:11.268 --> 00:38:19.179
And this is why the leadership development industry at least I would assert it's a $60 billion industry worldwide.

00:38:19.179 --> 00:38:20.824
Research has been done on whether it changes leadership behavior.

00:38:20.824 --> 00:38:24.012
Research has been done on whether it changes leadership behavior.

00:38:24.012 --> 00:38:28.166
Not so much.

00:38:28.166 --> 00:38:32.291
It's because it's not because we're teaching people the wrong things or we're trying to develop them the wrong things.

00:38:32.434 --> 00:38:39.403
There may be problems there too, and I think there are, but let's assume everything we taught them was perfect and if only they could apply it they would be better leaders.

00:38:39.403 --> 00:38:44.996
The problem is the application, because the overprotective program is what we've coined.

00:38:44.996 --> 00:38:46.483
It blocks people from doing this.

00:38:46.483 --> 00:38:49.684
Sure, you have to help people become aware of.

00:38:49.684 --> 00:38:51.239
So why is it?

00:38:51.239 --> 00:38:57.603
They violate their own principles and in your guy's case, so let's assume he has the rule not to do that.

00:38:57.603 --> 00:38:59.458
Why does he do it Nevertheless.

00:38:59.458 --> 00:39:01.005
What do you think?

00:39:01.855 --> 00:39:02.538
I think it's comfort.

00:39:02.538 --> 00:39:05.155
I'm moving, moving back into a space of comfort.

00:39:05.155 --> 00:39:16.106
If someone distracts or moves you off of your point, uh, you're going to have a tendency to go back to your natural uh programming that's his comfort.

00:39:16.628 --> 00:39:17.449
But he but he.

00:39:17.449 --> 00:39:19.614
What he's doing is a much more.

00:39:19.614 --> 00:39:22.219
I gotta know right now you in or out?

00:39:22.219 --> 00:39:25.583
No, no, effing about right.

00:39:25.583 --> 00:39:29.590
So that's his comfort zone.

00:39:29.590 --> 00:39:38.702
But it sounds to me like he's trying to exert a lot of control over the conversation because his theory is I'm worried about this person blowing up.

00:39:38.702 --> 00:39:43.782
So if I can kind of establish some dominance, and exert some fear out then.

00:39:43.782 --> 00:39:46.307
Then I can contain the upset.

00:39:49.099 --> 00:39:50.143
You might be right, todd, absolutely.

00:39:50.143 --> 00:39:52.443
I don't want to rule that out either.

00:39:52.443 --> 00:39:55.101
To your point, by the way, these things often team up.

00:39:55.875 --> 00:39:58.344
It's like a hybrid of comfort and control.

00:39:59.096 --> 00:40:00.300
You used the term emotional.

00:40:00.300 --> 00:40:02.121
I mean, that's one of the things that I really get with them as well.

00:40:02.121 --> 00:40:07.244
It's like, how do you convey emotion without being emotional?

00:40:07.244 --> 00:40:08.867
Uh, it's very important.

00:40:08.867 --> 00:40:14.269
How do you show them you're passionate, that you care so much, without flying off the handle?

00:40:14.771 --> 00:40:26.807
And I, you know, I often encourage them to uh role play those, those conversations with others as well, before you go in, just and then to have them fly off the handle in the role-playing and see how you handle it, so you can be ready for it, just in case it happens.

00:40:26.807 --> 00:40:27.996
I'll never forget there's a training.

00:40:27.996 --> 00:40:59.940
Probably 20 years ago, when I was actually on the other side in manufacturing, we were training some of our leaders, uh, utilizing this uh uh framework that I've talked about, and one of the role players absolutely came unhinged in the role-playing conversation against one of the top leaders that we had in the organization and I mean the whole class was, like you know, totally taken aback just in terms of how he went after that and he was a big guy anyway, like Brutus from from Popeye it was so funny.

00:41:00.202 --> 00:41:01.505
And it was to me.

00:41:01.505 --> 00:41:07.840
I didn't know he was going to do it, so I even I was a little bit uncomfortable, uh, when he went there.

00:41:07.840 --> 00:41:10.927
But then I started to laugh and realizing that we were just role playing.

00:41:10.947 --> 00:41:34.242
But I gotta tell you when you can, when you can predict, uh and overcome some of those things beforehand, that can be pretty powerful and I will say, I will say you like, thank goodness, this guy we're talking about has you, you know, because I mean you guided him in the right direction and now he's going to be in a much better position to have the kind of conversations that he needs to have.

00:41:34.242 --> 00:41:38.550
That will be, you know, of service to this person and the company that he works for.

00:41:38.550 --> 00:41:40.692
So keep going.

00:41:40.692 --> 00:41:41.054
I'm sorry.

00:41:43.322 --> 00:41:44.405
I look forward to hearing about it.

00:41:44.405 --> 00:41:47.224
It was actually a conversation that was supposed to happen today as we record this.

00:41:47.224 --> 00:41:51.123
Okay, I'm going to be following up with him just with a phone call or a text message to say how to go.

00:41:51.143 --> 00:41:53.280
Say a little prayer yeah exactly.

00:41:53.355 --> 00:42:05.518
Well, that was the other side of it, as I told him.

00:42:05.518 --> 00:42:10.202
By the way, regardless of where you sit on, I'm going to put it on my calendar to the time you're going to meet with them and I am going to say a little prayer, and I would encourage you to do the same thing before you go in, to give you the courage and the humility you need.

00:42:10.202 --> 00:42:13.391
Um, you know, holy spirit, fill you up with the courage and humility you need to have.

00:42:13.391 --> 00:42:16.242
This conversation needs to be had, absolutely, todd.

00:42:16.242 --> 00:42:17.246
You got your book coming up.

00:42:17.246 --> 00:42:22.141
The power of candor, and I know publishers well enough they may try and change the name on you.

00:42:22.141 --> 00:42:24.045
That's fine.

00:42:24.045 --> 00:42:25.646
Give me a sneak peek.

00:42:25.646 --> 00:42:27.210
Who are you writing this book for?

00:42:31.181 --> 00:42:33.009
And what do you want folks to take away from it?

00:42:33.009 --> 00:42:33.751
So thank you for asking.

00:42:33.751 --> 00:42:36.177
I guess this is time for a shameless plug.

00:42:36.197 --> 00:42:54.960
You know the alternative title could be, you know, since we're getting a little biblical here, the truth shall set you free, and that conviction is embedded, certainly, into our work and my firm.

00:42:54.960 --> 00:43:18.445
We have people who are all over the map in terms of their religious affiliations or the lack thereof, but this underlying principle is something that we all believe, and the reason I'm writing the book is two reasons.

00:43:18.445 --> 00:43:41.344
Well, let me say, the larger objective of the book is to provide people with knowledge they can use in real life to improve their important conversations in and outside of work, so that they, so that we can reduce human suffering and increase human joy and meaning.

00:43:41.344 --> 00:43:44.588
So so that's, that's what's driving it.

00:43:44.588 --> 00:43:53.347
Um, then the question is I would, I would ask, and I've asked myself this question why another book on conversations?

00:43:53.347 --> 00:43:55.297
Haven't we had enough?

00:43:55.637 --> 00:44:00.347
I mean, there's so many of them, um, and I think the reason is twofold.

00:44:00.347 --> 00:44:09.876
Um, reason is twofold.

00:44:09.876 --> 00:44:10.237
Um, there's not.

00:44:10.237 --> 00:44:11.420
I don't know how to express this exactly.

00:44:11.420 --> 00:44:33.996
I let me say it this way I think there is a knowledge gap as to what good looks like when it comes to having these important conversations in our lives, and so I mean to close that through the book by sharing the results of our work and research over 30 years, with easily 50,000 people at this point, um, because the field, um, there's some good ideas in these books.

00:44:33.996 --> 00:44:54.188
There are some gaps in the research and there are some downright bad ideas that are passed off as good practice, and so, to the degree that I can in the context of this book, I want to provide people with quality information about how to have good conversations.

00:44:55.914 --> 00:45:02.275
Secondly, love that premise no doubt about in terms of providing good data on how it works Absolutely.

00:45:02.918 --> 00:45:06.507
Nobody's geeked out more about on subject than we have in terms of the research.

00:45:06.507 --> 00:45:21.202
There are other people who have done great research on other topics, but we have, and I have been obsessed with only one thing, and this has been the one thing for now 30 years, so I better have something good to say, otherwise I've been wasting three decades.

00:45:21.202 --> 00:45:29.914
The second thing is, I don't want people to be naive about the challenge, let me say.

00:45:29.914 --> 00:46:12.878
The other thing is I'm trying to encourage people, inspire people to get to candor as well, to amplify that in their lives through a rigorous investigation of how they're doing now, what the unintended consequences are of that and the untapped opportunities and what could be possible for them at work and their lives, for their people, their teams, their families, all of it, if they could turn the volume up on candor in the way we defined it, right Collaborative search in order to make things better.

00:46:12.878 --> 00:46:23.699
But I also want to do something within the confines of the book that actually can make people better at this, so they don't have to spend, you know, or spend less money on expensive training, you know.

00:46:23.699 --> 00:46:36.721
But what I want to do with that, though, is parlay it into, or I'd rather connect it to the app, because we are in the development of an app, because the problem is, is that what?

00:46:36.721 --> 00:46:42.487
People who get access to my firm or Kim Scott's firm, whoever, it is right.

00:46:42.487 --> 00:46:42.847
What is it?

00:46:42.847 --> 00:46:44.380
Top 1% of the world, maybe?

00:46:44.380 --> 00:46:44.862
Right, it is right.

00:46:44.862 --> 00:46:45.103
What is it?

00:46:45.103 --> 00:46:46.731
Top 1% of the world?

00:46:46.731 --> 00:46:46.931
Right?

00:46:46.931 --> 00:46:47.715
I mean what?

00:46:47.715 --> 00:46:51.884
Those are the only people who need to have, who struggle with conversations and need to be better at it.

00:46:51.884 --> 00:46:56.041
So, but the thing is, it's like it's way too expensive and it's not doable.

00:46:56.041 --> 00:47:17.317
So, because I've been studying this phenomenon enough, we have a pretty good sense of what the algorithms are that underpin effective practice and also what the current algorithms are that are making people less effective these conversations, and we figured out how to disrupt, short circuit the current algorithm and replace it with a more effective algorithm.

00:47:17.317 --> 00:47:23.141
This is the benefit of not having written anything yet and just being in the lab and developing people for about 30 years.

00:47:23.945 --> 00:47:28.318
So the idea is bring any conversation you want to have with anyone about anything important, anytime.

00:47:28.318 --> 00:47:43.623
She's here for you and she will not only help you strategize for what to talk about and how to talk about it, but this is the kicker the quality of the practice that you will get.

00:47:43.623 --> 00:47:46.664
She will simulate the conversation you're going to have with the person.

00:47:46.664 --> 00:47:52.608
She will both play the person you're going to be and then she will give you, in the moment, feedback about how you're conducting it.

00:47:52.608 --> 00:47:56.858
If you're falling into a trap, she'll be like John, you're jumping to action.

00:47:57.418 --> 00:47:58.239
You're like what do you mean?

00:47:58.239 --> 00:48:03.445
I'm like you're actually offering solutions to a problem that you haven't even discussed yet and that haven't been actually been agreed.

00:48:03.445 --> 00:48:03.925
Do you see that?

00:48:03.925 --> 00:48:18.523
You're like, yeah, okay, so name the problem, okay, and then she'll guide you through that so that you can start disrupting the old pattern and start etching and rewiring a new pattern.

00:48:18.523 --> 00:48:21.356
And then the more you do it, it doesn't matter what.

00:48:21.356 --> 00:48:23.601
It could be feedback to your team.

00:48:23.601 --> 00:48:24.945
It could be trying to influence up.

00:48:24.945 --> 00:48:28.164
It could be leading across boundaries with people who don't have authority.

00:48:28.164 --> 00:48:29.697
It could be a conversation with a customer.

00:48:29.697 --> 00:48:34.297
It could be conversations at home, whatever outside of work, which are vast.

00:48:34.297 --> 00:48:39.489
You know, practice, practice, practice and you just become tons better.

00:48:39.489 --> 00:48:42.061
But it also is very practical.

00:48:42.061 --> 00:48:44.367
Application of it's going to help you solve a problem that you have right now.

00:48:44.956 --> 00:48:53.275
I think it's such a great application for what we need in leadership today utilizing AI, utilizing the app to help us have those conversations.

00:48:53.275 --> 00:48:58.740
I know I've benefited from it myself in terms of having those conversations prior to that and looking like.

00:48:58.780 --> 00:49:01.788
More people need access to John right, yes, absolutely.

00:49:01.788 --> 00:49:03.237
But you can't do it.

00:49:03.237 --> 00:49:06.137
You're limited because you're one human being, but if you can take You're spot on.

00:49:06.237 --> 00:49:08.945
I love the scale activity.

00:49:08.945 --> 00:49:14.905
I believe the word that I read the democratization of the tool, if you will.

00:49:14.905 --> 00:49:20.846
So the book will come a long way, but the actual app itself and making that available is going to be something powerful.

00:49:20.846 --> 00:49:23.097
I have loved our conversation.

00:49:23.097 --> 00:49:35.478
I think we should get back online once you get your book coming out as well, on the app gets tightened up and talk even more about this topic, because I know I could talk about it for hours, but I also want to honor your time and my time as well.

00:49:35.478 --> 00:49:44.766
And, todd, how can folks get in touch with you to learn more about candor, to learn more about you and be ready for when your book's coming out?

00:49:45.467 --> 00:49:49.385
Sure, and also if they want some free resources as well.

00:49:49.385 --> 00:49:57.664
So people can contact me directly, todd T-O-double-D at holzmancom, so H-O-L-Z-M-A-Ncom.

00:49:57.664 --> 00:49:59.557
I have a PA.

00:49:59.557 --> 00:50:03.007
Her name is Lace L-A-C-E same email address.

00:50:03.007 --> 00:50:19.467
They should also hook up with us on LinkedIn, because my faculty and I are posting on a daily basis, so we're trying to provide valuable content, and then we're also I mean there's like I don't know hundreds of stuff on our blog video and written.

00:50:19.467 --> 00:50:26.119
So just go to holzmanleadershipcom or holzmancom and it takes you to the same place and right-hand side of the screen.

00:50:26.119 --> 00:50:28.525
Click and you'll see all kinds of stuff that you can learn from right now.

00:50:29.306 --> 00:50:33.085
Excellent, I'll be sure to put the links in the show notes as well, so folks can get to those easily.

00:50:33.085 --> 00:50:33.606
They can hear them.

00:50:33.606 --> 00:50:36.384
They'll show up in the YouTube comments as well.

00:50:36.384 --> 00:50:39.041
Todd, I'll finish you up with the same question.

00:50:39.041 --> 00:50:51.806
I'll give you a billboard and you can put it anywhere you want to right behind you, somewhere there in New York city, behind your shoulder or wherever you want to put it.

00:50:51.806 --> 00:50:54.362
You can put any message you want to on that billboard.

00:50:54.362 --> 00:50:57.916
What's the message that you put on there and why do you put that message on there?

00:50:57.916 --> 00:51:00.202
Tell the truth, do good.

00:51:00.202 --> 00:51:02.447
I think that's a pretty good message.

00:51:02.447 --> 00:51:07.719
Tells a lot about what we're talking about with candor, you know again.

00:51:07.800 --> 00:51:10.567
You mentioned, too, the ability to do this outside of work.

00:51:10.567 --> 00:51:18.262
Like I can't wait to go and use some of this stuff as I walk out the door to my office having conversations with my son and others to help me go forward.

00:51:18.262 --> 00:51:20.695
So I have really enjoyed our conversation.

00:51:20.695 --> 00:51:24.844
I appreciate you investing the time with the leaders of the Uncommon Leader Podcast.

00:51:24.844 --> 00:51:31.458
Wish you the best in your work in your book and all the things you're doing to try and make an impact in this area.

00:51:31.458 --> 00:51:33.304
Thanks, tom, my pleasure.

00:51:33.304 --> 00:51:40.344
You're welcome, thank you, and that wraps up another episode of the Uncommon Leader Podcast.

00:51:40.344 --> 00:51:41.487
Thanks for tuning in today.

00:51:41.487 --> 00:51:48.958
If you found value in this episode, I encourage you to share it with your friends, colleagues or anyone else who could benefit from the insights and inspiration we've shared.

00:51:48.958 --> 00:51:55.601
Also, if you have a moment, I'd greatly appreciate if you could leave a rating and review on your favorite podcast platform.

00:51:55.601 --> 00:52:03.458
Your feedback not only helps us to improve, but it also helps others discover the podcast and join our growing community of uncommon leaders.

00:52:03.458 --> 00:52:09.414
Until next time, go and grow champions.